Song of Roland (A Leader)

I
I would say that it is a little bit of both worlds. A leader has to have a little bit of both this aspects so as to run a well – off country or business. But if I was pushed to a point where I would have to actually choose a quality, I would go with the quality that a leader can lead by setting an example through individual excellence. Look at most successful businessmen today. They usually use this quality as a main driving force and to inspire both themselves and the people around them. They earn respect from people who they do not even know and the people who work both close and far from them. They may be looked up to as role models, figureheads or leaders in their own aspect. This was a great quality for most leaders a like. When their subjects saw all his or her hard earned life style they were also maybe inspired to go home and try make something of themselves like open a business or try and bulk up to become one of the king’s famous knights at the now famous round table. I strongly support a leader should have both aspects and qualities of a leader, the ability to set an example through individual excellence and the ability to make sure that the whole team functions smoothly as a single unit I think that if you lean more to one of the two then a person can defeat the whole idea but it takes a little bit of both worlds to make a great leader in the community.

II
 A leader first of all should be wise and always know what he is up against.
 A leader should listen to his people.
 A leader should not go against his people
 A leader should be a strong or courageous fellow
 A leader should be honest with his tax payer’s money and be responsible

III
In my opinion he was not a good leader because he did not listen to the people. He was actually drowning in his own pride and refusing to be wrong because he was always right. And that is why I stated that it takes both abilities to be a good leader.